News - Is Warzone 2 Still Trash 2024
I actually really, really liked it and the battle 27, shreds, all right now. I don't know if I'm actually going to get the chance to hop on and use it and get a game to play with it, but it's a nice addition. Even though it's recycled, it's a nice addition nonetheless. And guys, there's a whole lot of other things coming out in season 3 Reloaded, but I'm not going to cover all of them because, to be honest, a lot of it is just patching some fuckups from their past, and a lot of it is just [__]] that I don't really care about, but now we need to get back to my original question: MW 2019 Part 3 is still trash.
First of all, I've never believed that this game was actually 100% trash. I thought it was very lackluster for what it was and what it was being named after, especially in this continuation of Dog. MW, 2019s, and Games is just not my cup of tea that we continue with this [__]] 2019 [__]]. and I've always been one to say that of the entire MW 2019 games in this era, this is probably the best one that we have out of the bunch.
I even prefer this game over Cold War, but despite me preferring this game over those games, I still have the least amount of time played on this game as opposed to the other games. Why is that? It's great if you guys want to remodel everything; it's great if you guys want to have all of these new maps coming out in season 3 and have all of these cool ass updates with camos.
It's cool, but the fact that you took this long is going to be your biggest downfall; it is your detriment, and this is coming from somebody who has said that this game has been dying and dying and dying, or at least this franchise's numbers for this game have actually increased a little bit now. I do think it has plateaued absolutely, like we've already seen the peak of this game; there's no way it's going to go any higher than that, and even with nice additions like season 3's Maps Yeah, the player count has gone up, and it's reached peaks that we haven't seen in months, but it's eventually going to die down, and it's not really going to go back to its peak ever again.
But regardless, over the last few months, the numbers for this game have generally improved, and that is a good thing to see. But with that being said, we're still not going to come anywhere near the point where this game could have been at launch, and it's because of the fact that they [__]] up so badly at the launch that there are two key takeaways.
Because of the dog [__] launch, the first thing is that we're never going to see the numbers improve so drastically that we see a crazy resurgence. In the livelihood of Call of Duty, I don't think this game has it, even though it's doing fine right now. I just don't think this is the game to play.
The other thing is that, going forward, we've seen reports on this from Activision themselves. They claim that because of the reception to the launch of this game, they're essentially chalking the entire idea behind no original content at launch for any more Call of Duty. Once again. I don't know whose bright idea it was to launch this game with zero original content, and every single one of you gu lickers out there that was talking [__]] to the scat Master, you can suck my [__]] Dick, yeah, this game can bounce back from being an absolute dog.
But that doesn't take away from the fact that I called it from the very beginning that this would be one of the biggest problems that this game ever faces, and it's not even a gameplay-related problem, and that is where people [__]] up royally. Because now that you've lost so many people when the question is presented to you, is this game worth coming back to in 2024?
You got to put into perspective how many people left at the end of 2023. And while some of those people have come back because of season 3, that doesn't mean the large majority of people are going to come back or have already come back. As a matter of fact, I'm going to be the one to tell you guys that this game is still indefinitely chocked.
Okay, yeah, it's improved a little bit, and yes. I can admit that, but the launch of this game sealed the deal; it put the nail in the coffin for this game for the rest of its life cycle, and no matter what Sledgehammer Games does, yes, you might think I'm being a [__] hater, but I don't give a flying [__] the fact that you had the audacity.
To launch this game in the way that you did, you will never have a peak higher than your launch window. No matter what you do to improve the game, no matter how many more labor hours you put into developing and producing other [__]] for this game post-launch, it could be the craziest [__]] that you ever put in this game; it'll never go back.
I'm sorry, but that's just the truth, and so while yes, I have props for Sledgehammer Games, at the same time, you still need to scold them. Sledgehammer and Activision I don't know what's wrong with Activision, but it's because of your horrible decision-making initially that no matter what you do now, it's never going to actually fix the inherent problem of this game that it had at launch and the fact that you couldn't keep up your player count and satisfy the people that were still playing between November and March.
That is the reason that this game will never be considered a top-five game. I will never consider this to be a good Call of Duty game, even if they add my favorite [__]] in month number six. In month number seven, you could add the craziest coolest [__] ever; it's not going to undo the problem that you created for yourselves.
At launch, and so to those of you who are thinking about coming back to this game. I still have the same opinion that I've had in the past: if you can get this game for free, [__] it; if you can get this game for like 90% off, then maybe if you're thinking about getting this game for anything more than like 25 bucks, chalk it all; it's not a good idea; and guys, trust me.
I'm coming back to ranked play. I'm going to get more game plays, and there's going to be a lot of other things to talk about, like Black Ops 6. I want to make a bigger article about modern gaming in general and some of the issues. I want to make a article about that pay-to-win skin from a couple of weeks ago.
There's a lot of things I got to catch up on, guys, and I'm sorry that I've neglected the channel a little bit, but like I said at the start of this article. I have a lot of motivation, so please. Expect some new content very soon, and expect a whole lot of it as well. I just thought I'd pop back in with a little question, and so I'm going to give this to you guys: What do you think is all right?
Do you think that this game is worth coming back to? Do you think these changes undo all of the [__] since the launch of this game? And would you even recommend this game to anyone at this point? I really don't know if I would, even with some of the positive changes. But that's going to do it for me today, guys.
I'm curious to know what you guys think about this. Let's change this one up a little bit. And yeah, guys, it's been the boy foly. Have yourselves a good one. I'm out of here, toodles.
PREVIOUS Page
