News - Warzone 2. 0 Benchmarks With Budget Graphics Cards
Intro
very quick and easy article Today, we're benchmarking Warzone 2.0 with some popular budget graphics cards.
Sponsor
Let's get started real quickly before moving on. Today's article is sponsored by the auto-full gaming chair, and as you can see, this has a super unique graffiti design to it. This is a super detailed, colorful, and vibrant design on the chair, and this carries over to not just the chair itself but also the lower back support pillow as well as the headrest pillow that comes included underneath the chair.
There's also a leg rest, and when you combine that with the reclining feature, you can get some serious break time in between. After landing all the headshots during your gaming sessions, I personally really enjoyed the tier's build quality and assembly process. It also sells a ton of other really unique designs instead of just the basic colors like you typically see.
You can check them all out here on their website and social media channels, and they're also offering all of you a really solid Black Friday and Cyber Monday sale of 60 percent off if you use code BFCM.
Benchmarks
He recently benchmarked Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, which you can check out in the upper right-hand corner if you're interested, but here's the list of GPUs that we're testing today on the AMD side: the RX 584 gigabyte, the RX 6400, and the RX 6600 XT. NVIDIA we have the GTX 970. GTX 1060, 6 gigabyte GTX 1080, which I don't have footage for whoops, we also have the GTX 1630.
GTX 1650, and finally we have the RTX 2060, and just like last time, we do have some team blue action for our run today as I picked up the Intel Arc 750 just so we can show how that's doing as well. We did actually have to take it out of our Black Friday inventory, and if you didn't already hear, on Black Friday we're going to be selling at least 10 gaming PCs at just completely obnoxious prices.
I'm serious; no place on the entire internet is going to compete with us. We have the Ryzen 5 7600X.
Results
Scale the default minimum setting, which is set to 50, so we just bumped that up, and here are the results. Now, this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone, but yeah, as you can see, Ozone. But if those numbers don't look attractive to you, let's get into these benchmarks with each GPU and the settings that we recommend running for each of these cards.
As a quick disclaimer, we're only testing the preset quality options and not diving deep into every single setting. You could certainly tweak the settings to squeeze a bit more performance if you wanted, but the purpose of this article is to simply show you right around what you can expect with these cards.
Starting with team red, we have the still very popular RX 580; remember that this is the four gigabyte model, and here we put the settings at true 1080p, minimum; that's the 50 resolution and scale, and we actually got very close to our 144 FPS target with an average of 130. After that, we have the 6400; the reason we have this in the studio is because of that super budget 200 gaming PC that I uploaded last week, which you can check out in the upper right hand corner, and here again in 1080p true minimum we got 159 FPS, not too shabby, and for our last AMD card, we have the RX 6600.
XT, and here we actually bumped up the settings to Balance, which is basically medium settings, and we got an average of 164. Before going to the team green side, we'll check out this Intel Arc a750, and honestly, this is just pretty pathetic with 1080P and minimum settings. We got 116 FPS, not great for a $300 graphics card, but hopefully some Intel drivers come here soon, which should significantly bump these numbers up for the first Nvidia card we have, the GTX 970, which is still a very solid option for a hundred dollars or even less than that right now and here with 1080P and minimum settings.
After that, we have the GTX 1060, a 6-gigabyte card; still loving this Ace; just doing all white cards, which is what we're rocking today; and here in 1080p minimum, we got 133 FPS. After that, we have the GTX 1080, a new addition to the benchmarking arsenal this time, and in 1080p minimum but with a 90 resolution scale, we got right on the money at 144 FPS.
Obviously, you'd be perfectly fine with a 100-scale game, but we were trying to target 144 FPS. For these benchmarks, which are getting towards the end, we have one of the most hated GPUs on the planet, the GTX 1630, and honestly, it probably should continue to be hated because we only got 88 FPS with 1080p at minimum settings.
After that, we have the GTX 1650, the non-super edition, just as a reminder, and with 1080P and minimum we got 125 FPS, and finally, for our last card, we have the ever-so-popular RTX 2060, and in 1080p with 90 resolution and skill, we got 151 FPS, and before I let you guys go. I do want to hear who is making an early run at the war zone.